In
2011, almost 2012, why is technology still a class kids go to to learn
to use a tool and not an integrated part of the lessons we teach?
In my K-4 Elementary Building I feel teachers try to incorporate technology in authentic and meaningful ways as much as possible but that the technology may become a "tool" for several different reasons:
1. Teacher training time is limited. Teachers may have gained a limited comfort level with the technology available and have not had the time to explore how they could use the tools in a more in-depth nature. As technology changes are unlimited & rapid while teachers' "free" time is limited it makes it hard to keep an equal balance.
2. Emphasis on state assessments and indicators have become a driving force for instruction. This often limits time for much else...especially using technology in a more open-ended, creative format. I will be interested to see how the new Core Standards affect instruction and the use of technology as many of the new indicators are more open-ended, collaborative, interpretive, etc. The new standards could be a window of opportunity.
Your reasons make a lot of sense...and I too am eager to see what impact the Core Standards will have, as well as possible changes in NCLB - not just on technology but in all areas. The infamous pendulum may be swinging a new direction. Also, I think that the very fact that you and other teachers are trying your best to integrate is something to be celebrated.
ReplyDelete